|
Teutoburg Forest: The Battle That
Saved the West
Arminius (“Hermann the Liberator”) and his German
warriors crushed the
three Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest – and in
so doing redirected
the course of history.
by John Eidsmoe 11 September 2009
September, 9 A.D., Kalkriese Hill, northern Germany:
the Germanic warriors
waited in grim silence. Three Roman legions,
commanded by General Publius
Quintilius Varus, advanced across the Rhine into
Anglo-Saxon territory. The
Romans hoped to expand Roman power, Roman law, and
Roman culture. The
Germans hoped to preserve their Teutonic laws and
institutions and their way of
life.
Probably neither side realized that the Battle of
Teutoburg Forest would decide
the course of Western law and Western civilization
for millennia to come.
And now, in the year 2009, the 2,000th anniversary
of the battle, very few
Americans have even heard of the battle, and fewer
still understand its
significance.
Contestants and Stakes
The ancestors of these German warriors had lived in
these fields and forests for
centuries untold, possibly arriving with the great
Indo-European migrations
around 2000 B.C. They farmed and hunted, living in
rural compounds consisting
of several homes, usually occupied by relatives,
with other compounds or villages
a few miles away. They worshipped their pagan gods,
like Wotan (Odin) and
Donnar (Thor), who represented forces of nature, and
they lived by the old
Teutonic virtues: keeping one’s word, valor in
battle, loyalty to family and
community, and hospitality to strangers.
And they lived under the ancient Teutonic common
law. The Germans practiced
a highly decentralized form of government, with law
based on custom and
administered by a local council (witan) composed of
all free men, who served
both as a lawmaking body and as a jury for civil and
criminal cases. 1
But Rome threatened to change that. They, too, were
a Western people, who
probably came to Italy during the same Indo-European
migrations. At one time
Rome was a republic, governed by the Senatus Populus
Que Romanus (Senate of
the People of Rome, or SPQR) under the Law of the
Twelve Tables. But in the
century before the birth of Christ, the Roman
republic gradually gave way to the
empire. Power became centralized in Rome, and the
Senate was reduced to a
figurehead, rubber-stamping the emperor’s edicts.
2
And the Roman Empire was gradually expanding
northward. Around 50 B.C.,
Julius Caesar decided to subdue Gaul (France). The
various Celtic tribes united
under a chieftain named Vercengetorix; they fought
bravely, but their ferocity
was no match for the discipline of the Roman
legions.
Rome then turned its attention to Germany. Some of
the southern German tribes,
those south and west of the Rhine, succumbed to
Roman rule. But those east of
the Rhine, and especially those of Saxony, resisted.
As these Germanic warriors waited for battle, they
knew they were facing the
wrath of the most powerful army the world had ever
seen. The Roman army was
divided into 28 legions, each consisting of
approximately 5,000 soldiers. The
legionnaires were exceptionally well-disciplined,
and they were in superb physical
condition. In addition to 70-80 pounds of armor and
weapons, each soldier
marched carrying a 40-pound pack. Their primary
weapons were spears, but
they also used the gladius, a short two-edged sword
that was well suited for
thrusting, slashing, blocking, and parrying. They
also carried rectangular shields
that, when locked together in formation, made them
almost invulnerable to
attack. They used a battle formation known as the
maniple, similar to the
Macedonian phalanx, but looser and more flexible and
therefore effective on a
variety of terrains.
The 17th, 18th, and 19th legions had been sent to
Germany, and Emperor
Augustus had appointed Publius Quintilius Varus
governor of Rhineland. Varus
was a patrician aristocrat and a skilled diplomat
who had rendered great service
to Rome on foreign fields, but he had little actual
battle experience.
The Germans lacked the discipline of the Romans, and
their steel was of inferior
quality. But they possessed more than size,
strength, and courage in battle. The
army consisted of all able-bodied freemen, and they
fought with shields, spears,
battle-axes, and occasionally large broadswords,
more powerful than the Roman
gladius but more difficult to use in close
infighting. They commonly attacked
using a wedge formation, and cowardice in battle was
punishable by death. They
fought with machine-like efficiency in smaller
groups but were unused to fighting
together in large armies.
This time the Germans had a chieftain named Hermann,
perhaps better known at
that time by his Latinized name Arminius. Born a
prince of the Cherusci tribe,
Arminius had been raised in Rome as a hostage, and
he received military training
and became a Roman officer. He learned Latin and
received Roman citizenship,
an honor bestowed on non-Romans only for exceptional
service. His years of
service to Rome gave him a thorough understanding of
Roman military strategy
and tactics, and of the Roman mindset. But he had
not forgotten his Germanic
3
heritage, and as a young man he returned to his
German people. Arminius
managed to unite some of the northern German tribes
and instilled in them a
passionate desire to preserve their independence
from Roman domination.
Varus, the Roman commander, and Arminius, the German
commander, knew
that northern Germany was a tinderbox that needed
only a spark to erupt into a
major conflagration. Rome claimed authority over
northern Germany; the
German tribes had not accepted Roman rule but had
not yet openly revolted.
Arminius devised a brilliant strategy. He caused a
rumor to reach Varus that two
German towns east of Teutoburg Forest had openly
revolted against Rome. As
expected, Varus decided that a display of force was
necessary to suppress this
revolt and prevent it from spreading to other parts
of Germany. He led his three
legions, totaling up to 20,000 men, across the Rhine
and into Teutoburg Forest.
And Arminius planned his ambush.
East of the Rhine, in Teutoburg Forest, is Kalkriese
Hill. A narrow road stretched
from west to east along the northern edge of the
hill. For several miles the road
runs between a marsh to the north, known as the
Great Bog, and Kalkriese Hill
to the south. The narrowness of the road, as
Arminius knew, would force Varus
to march his army only eight men abreast, and
therefore he would have to
spread his legions over several miles. Arminius knew
his German warriors could
not match the disciplined Roman legions in open
battle, but he also knew the
Romans preferred to fight on open terrain and were
less effective in woodlands
and marshes.
Arminius and his warriors constructed earthworks on
the north side of Kalkriese
Hill. He probably placed 5,000 warriors behind the
earthworks, 5,000 in the
woods behind them, 7,000 on the northeast slope of
the hill, and 1,000 at
strategic points in the marsh north of the road. As
Peter S. Wells wrote in The
Battle That Stopped Rome,
The Germans waited nervously behind the sod wall.
Some of the older men, who
had fought against the Roman legions during the
campaigns of Drusus,
Ahenobarbus, and Tiberius, or who had lost kinsmen
in battles with those armies,
hated the Romans with passion and were eager to
attack the troops and to kill
as many as they could. But most were frightened,
even terrified, at the prospect
of confronting the dreaded legions in face-to-face
combat.
In September of 9 A.D., Varus and his legions
entered Teutoburg Forest. At this
point, a torrential downpour occurred. And with the
legions and their wagons
bogged down in the rain and mud, Arminius and his
warriors attacked.
The attack began with a barrage of spears thrown
through the air. Wells
estimates that each of the 5,000 warriors behind the
earthworks could have
4
thrown one spear with accuracy every four seconds,
so within 20 seconds the
Roman legions could have been struck with as many as
25,000 spears. Wells
writes,
Within ten seconds of the start of the spear
barrage, the marching units
disintegrated into chaos. The attacked soldiers
stopped walking, in order to try to
defend themselves. Since they were marching in close
formation and few could
see much beyond the men immediately around them,
those behind kept
marching forward and crashed into their fellows. At
first, soldiers farther back in
the column were unaware of what was happening toward
the front, and they
kept pressing on.… Like a chain-reaction highway
crash, men piled into one
another.…
Wounded, dying, and already dead men quickly covered
the track, making
movement increasingly difficult for the others. The
scene was one of complete
chaos — spears falling like hail, men collapsing and
gasping, even those not yet
wounded struggling to remain on their feet, and
occasionally frenzied horses and
mules crashing through the swarm of troops. Within
minutes, thousands of
Roman soldiers lay dead or dying, pierced by spears,
while others struggled to
stay on their feet and to use their shields for
shelter.
With a deafening war cry, the German warriors then
leaped over the earthworks
and charged into the Roman ranks. “For the first
time in their lives,” writes Wells,
“they saw Roman legionaries — representatives of the
imperial power that
marched with impunity through their lands, bribing
their chiefs and subverting
their politics — powerless and helpless.”
Some authorities believe the battle was over in an
hour; others believe it
stretched out over three days. Possibly the outcome
was clear after the first hour,
but skirmishing continued for three days as Roman
survivors fought their way
back to the Rhine. But this is clear: Arminius and
his German warriors had won a
resounding victory. Of the 15,000-20,000 Roman
soldiers, fewer than 1,000
survived. German losses were about 500 dead, 1,500
wounded. News of the
defeat caused consternation in Rome. Suetonius, in
his Lives of the Twelve
Caesars, wrote that Emperor Augustus banged his head
against the palace walls,
shouting Quintili Vare, legions redde! (“Quintilius
Varus, give me back my
legions!”) But rather than face the ignominy of
defeat, Varus committed suicide
after the battle. And the 17th, 18th, and 19th
legions were never restructured,
which is unique in Roman history.
The Course of History
More battles between Rome and the Germans took place
in the years that
followed, but the Rhine was firmly established as
the northernmost boundary of
Roman expansion. And as a result, northern Germany
and Scandinavia remained
free from the influence of Roman culture and Roman
law.
5
The areas of southern Germany that fell to Roman
domination largely adopted
the centralizing features of Roman law. The Code of
the Visigoths, governing
what is now Spain and southern France, contained
many features of the Roman
Theodosian Code, and on Christmas Day 800 A.D. the
Pope crowned
Charlemagne Holy Roman Emperor: “Charles Augustus,
crowned by God, great
and peace-giving emperor, life and victory!”
Although he was a devout Christian
and a great ruler in many ways, Charlemagne governed
largely according to
Roman law, combining it with some Christian and some
Germanic elements. And
in 911 A.D., after King Charles the Simple of France
gave the Normandy
peninsula to the Viking jarl Hrolfr (Rollo), Rollo
and his Norman descendants,
including William the Conqueror, likewise adopted
French customs and the
Romanized law of France.
But in northern Germany, especially among the Angles
and the Saxons, the old
Teutonic common law continued, with its emphasis on
individual rights and
decentralized government. And in Scandinavia the
Viking law was similar to it, in
some ways even more decentralized than in Germany.
In the late 400s A.D., after the Roman legions were
withdrawn from Britain, the
Angles and Saxons of northern Germany and the Jutes
of Denmark migrated to
Britain. After securing the land from the raids of
the Picts and Scots, these tribes
established a kingdom based upon the old Teutonic
common law. Britain became
known as Angle-land, or England, and in keeping with
Teutonic concepts of
decentralized government, the land was divided into
seven kingdoms: the
Saxons occupied the southern kingdoms of West Saxony
(Wessex), East Saxony
(Essex), and South Saxony (Sussex); the Angles
occupied the northern kingdoms
of East Anglia, Northumbria, and Mercia; and the
Jutes occupied Kent in the
southeast. Roughly speaking, each 10 families were
led by a tithing-man, each
50 by a vil-man, each 100 by a hundred-man, and each
1,000 constituted a shire,
headed by an eolderman (shortened to earl) and his
assistant, the reef. The reef
was a law-enforcement officer, and the term “shire
reef” became “sheriff.”
Each shire was governed by a council known as the
witan, composed of all
freemen in the shire. The witan at first served as
both a legislative body and as a
jury to try civil and criminal cases, but eventually
the legislative and jury
functions of the witan were separated. Once a year
all of the witans of the
kingdom met together in a grand council called the
witangemot. 2
When the Anglo-Saxons first came to Britain, they
still retained their pagan
beliefs. But the Celts converted many of them to
Christianity, around 597
Archbishop Augustine arrived from Rome to further
their Christianization, and by
the late 600s England was a Christian country. The
Laws of King Aethelbirht,
baptized by Augustine in 601 A.D., reflect a
Christian perspective, as do the Laws
6
of King Wihtraed (691-725 A.D.) of Kent and King Ine
of Wessex (688-725 A.D.).
King Alfred the Great’s Book of Dooms (890 A.D.)
began with a recitation of the
Ten Commandments and was interspersed throughout
with Old Testament and
New Testament references.
Viking raids on the British Isles began around 787
A.D., and Vikings soon ruled
large portions of England, Scotland, and Ireland.
King Alfred repelled the Viking
advances and entered into a treaty by which the
Vikings could rule areas of
northeastern England north of a line called the
Danelaw, with the further
requirement that the Viking King Guthrun become a
Christian. Viking law and
Anglo-Saxon law developed out of the same Teutonic
background and were very
similar. The Viking witan was called the thing and
met at the call of any freeman.
A judge or lawspeaker, called the godi, presided and
was elected to a three-year
term. Once a year he was required to recite from
memory one-third of the Viking
law code, so the entire code was recited over his
three-year term.
In 1066 A.D. William the Conqueror (a descendant of
Hrolfr or Rollo) of
Normandy defeated King Harold at the Battle of
Hastings, and England fell under
Norman rule. William did not try to change
everything at once; he left the
witangemot intact and gave it the French name
parliament. But he and his
successors worked to centralize government under the
Norman monarchy, while
the Anglo-Saxons and their Viking allies struggled
to preserve local shire
government.
The Great Charter
In 1215 A.D. the English people, particularly the
Anglo-Saxons and their Viking
allies, chafed under the tyranny of the Norman King
John, and they looked for
leadership to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Stephen
Langton, of Lincolnshire, a
Viking settlement north of the Danelaw. Archbishop
Langton instructed the
barons and bishops on their duty to interpose
themselves on behalf of the people
they represented against the tyranny of the higher
magistrates. He supervised
the drafting of the Magna Charta and commissioned
Robert Fitzwalter as the
Marshall of the Army of God and Holy Church, and
together they met King John
at Runnymeade and forced him to sign the Magna
Charta, which guaranteed the
ancient God-given rights of Englishmen. But the
struggle against the forces of
centralized power continued during the ensuing
centuries, culminating with the
Glorious Revolution of 1688, the English Bill of
Rights of 1689, and the American
Declaration of Independence of 1776.
Meanwhile, in Germany Arminius had been largely
forgotten. But in the 1500s
Martin Luther, who had studied law before becoming a
monk, defended the old
Teutonic common law against the usurpations of the
Holy Roman Emperor. He
revived the memory of Arminius and called him by the
Germanicized form of his
name, Hermann the Liberator, and cultivated him into
a national hero.
7
In 1839, construction commenced on the
Hermannsdenkmal, a large statue of
Hermann atop a pavilion near Detmold in the
Teutoburg Forest. A similar statue
and pavilion can be seen on a hill west of New Ulm,
a German community in
central Minnesota, called the “Hermann Heights
Monument” but better known to
local residents as “Hermann the German.” Standing
atop the monument with his
sword held aloft, Hermann defiantly faces east
toward Rome (and also toward
Washington, D.C.!). Besides the observances at
Kalkriese, Germany, New Ulm
will hold a celebration the 2,000th anniversary of
the Battle of Teutoburg Forest
on September 17-20, including a battle reenactment
(www.hermannmonument.com), and the city of Hermann,
Missouri, will hold a
Victory Celebration on September 23-27 at which a
Hermann statue will be
dedicated (www.historichermann.com).
And well they should. Hermann the Liberator not only
preserved the freedom of
northern Germany and Scandinavia, he made possible
the transmission of the
common law to England and, eventually, to America.
And what of American freedom in 2009? The land of
the free chafes under the
rule of a government that dwarfs that of Rome, under
a president who seeks
more power than even King John could imagine.
Hermann the Liberator, Alfred
the Great, Archbishop Langton, George Washington, we
need your likeness today!
John Eidsmoe is a retired U.S. Air Force
lieutenant colonel, pastor with the Association of Free
Lutheran Congregations, professor at the Oak Brook
College of Law & Government Policy, and
counsel to the Foundation for Moral Law in
Montgomery, Alabama.
1 It is
unclear at what point in history the Germans developed this Teutonic
common law. Some
believe it existed even before the Indo-European
migrations, while others believe it did not take
shape until after the Anglo-Saxon settlement of the
British Isles. This author believes the Teutonic
common law was largely developed at least before the
Battle of Teutoburg Forest.
2 A
good discussion of Anglo-Saxon common law may be found in Frederic
Seebohm, Tribal
Custom in Anglo-Saxon Law (Longmans, Green, & Co.:
1911); Francis Owen, The Germanic
People: Their Origin, Expansion, & Culture (Barnes &
Noble: 1960, 1993); and W. Cleon
Skousen, The Making of America: The Substances and
Meaning of the Constitution (National
Center for Constitutional Studies: 1985), pp. 54-59.
|